Proposals of #48

Inflation Rate Change Correction

Exec Legacy Content
passed
Expected result
Turnout / Quorum
41.63% / 40.00%
Voting start 2021.06.02 at 19:06:15
Voting end 2021.06.16 at 19:06:15
100.00%
109 420 614 atom
Yes
0.00%
1 983 atom
No
0%
0 atom
Veto
0.00%
2 015 atom
Abstain

Details

logo
Proposer
-
Total deposit
64 atom
Submit time
2021.06.02 at 19:06:15
Deposit end time
2021.06.16 at 19:06:15

Description

The purpose of changing the network’s inflation rate is to protect it from unbonding shocks that threaten to compromise the security of the network. When the bonded ratio gets below the goal bonded ratio (currently at 66% on the hub) the inflation rate & effective yield of staked atoms goes up in order to incentivize holders to bond new ATOM’s, providing additional security to the network. Inversely, if we regain a desired amount of staked tokens, the yield will drop, decreasing effective yields for all delegators. Ideally the inflation rate starts changing fast, optimizing network security over monetary hardness. To figure out what an appropriate selection for the cosmos hub would be, I created excel sheets to run through all the different scenarios to find what value made the inflation rate react in an optimal manner. I came to the conclusion that 1 (AKA 100% per year is the maximum slope of the inflation curve) gave the most ideal characteristics, with the added benefit of simplifying the equation. I’ll give some examples on how it would react. Since unbonding is what we are protecting against, I will look at flash unbonds while the inflation rate is at the floor due to that being the #1 time of vulnerability.

Votes

Voter
Answer